Home Account Search
CPSIA Update
A bit of good news for the printing industry was handed down from our Washington overlords a few days ago: the Consumer Product Safety Commission made an exemption for childrens books to the CPSIA, which stands for the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act. Read about the exemption here.

[climb on soapbox]

For those not in the know, the CPSIA was an attempt by regulators in Washington to protect us from poisonous lunch boxes from China. At least that's the intent in a nutshell. But of course, the result of the act was that all of a sudden anything that could possibly be defined as a childs toy, was - so now everything potentially involved in a retail environment and could be touched by a kid was subject to these new strictures, and compliance had, and still has to, be demonstrated through third party testing. This dragnet swept a lot of industries into a very wide net; one of those classic "unintended consequences" thing. But Washington, being Washington, wouldn't recognize its own mistake and refused to reconsider the vague silliness of the regulation, which has of course gotten less silly and more serious - and serious means it has started adding costs in a big way.

Look, these regulators - I honestly don't think they're out to destroy American industry. I just think they're like anybody else - they want to do a good job. Their job is to issue regulations and then enforce those regulations. In order to feel like they are doing a good job, they need to keep regulating and enforcing. I get that. Pretty much human nature.

But I thought the administration told us they were going to start doing a cost/benefit analysis of these regulations, streamline the process, etc. And while I appreciate the exemption, the damage from the initial regulation is pretty much done - our customers now expect us to do testing on our products. And while that in itself might be a good thing, it adds costs - and all of these costs eventually make their way to the consumer. So as the stuff we make gets more expensive, the customer might end up sourcing the product from China or someplace with less regulations - and the result could be an end product that is actually less safe than the one we were making initially.

I'm just saying that we have to have a strong manufacturing base in this country; when our regulators overreact to a scare created by a cheap product from a country without the regulatory scheme we have in place, they can severly hamstring industries they really had no intention of hurting, by the very act of their own reaction. This can damage American competitiveness and send manufacturing to environments less safe than our own. Newton's third law, right? For every action there is an opposite and equal reaction..

[/climb down off soapbox]

Regulatory Overload
I read the Wall Street Journal, and one of my favorite parts are the letters to the editor. They're not the normal, run of the mill letters. I've always thought they sounded like they were written by smart people with opinions.. And I'm not actually the sort that writes a lot of letters to the editor, but in this case - I felt compelled to respond. The WSJ had written an editorial about the Consumer Product Safety Commission and its upcoming rule to decrease the amount of lead allowed in certain items. Now, that sounds great on its face. I mean, I'm not a huge fan of lead. I don't think I should eat it or anything. But I'm also a fairly reasonable sort, and when the CPSC does this sort of thing in response to a headline someplace, the rules they put in place affect EVERYONE who is doing business in this country.. And I honestly don't think they care about it, the jeopardy it places us in as manufacturers. So anyway, I wrote a letter. And they published it! Maybe, just maybe - I might be a smart person with an opinion! Well, probably shouldn't get too far ahead of myself... But here it is:

I think over regulation is a HUGE issue in this country. Our politicans like to talk about creating jobs? What they need to do is get the hell out of the way. Stop crushing us with taxes and useless regulations that stifle the creative spirit that is America.. If they would put a leash on the bureacrats that issue these burdensome and job killing regulations, this country might have a shot at getting the unemployment rate back under 9%. But I have feeling that this won't happen. For while they kill jobs in manufacturing in this country, those same bureaucrats are saving their own jobs. Classic catch-22....
Tough Times
Saw where Padgett Printing closed down in Dallas. Now, I don't really know Padgett - just read about them in trade magazines on occasion, but they always seemed like a good shop. And I've heard through the grapevine that a competitor of ours up the street has filed for bankruptcy protection. And that printer in Huntsville that billed themselves as the "Media Printer.." - they shut down their facility for production and now it's just a sales office - which is code word for broom closet in the basement. Rough time to be a printer I guess. Unless you're us. We're up in sales, up in volume, up in employees. We're like that old Superbowl halftime show - Up With People! Except it's Up With Printing! People ask about the secret and I don't know that it's anything more complicated than simply loving your customers, and outworking the competition. We strive to be a world class manufacturer right here in the USA. And our customers are rewarding us for it. In our office, we have a copy of Leon L. Bean's philosophy on Customers:

Now Leon's primary customer back in the day was a hunter or even a trapper, so he refers a lot to a singular "him", but it really holds true in any organization, in my opinion... Think I might go buy some boots..
The FSC Scam

I've read some interesting articles recently about the potential decline of FSC and other third party certification outfits and it got me thinking. Since PSI has been both SFI and FSC certified for a few years now, I've been able to see the proverbial trees in the forest. My take? Anybody that thinks using FSC certified material actually helps the environment is barking up the wrong tree.

I've always thought of PSI as a very environmentally aware company. As a matter of fact, I think that environmental concern is high with a lot of companies these days, and not because some third party told us to be that way but because it is good for our country, good for our souls. Call me naive, but I also believe that the total environment in which we live is vastly improved over what it was 80-100 years ago, and that the overall tendency for us is to try to improve our condition, not make it worse. Am I a pollyanna? Maybe. Maybe not.

I used to work for Greenpeace a long time ago; My green cred is still fairly solid. That's why what I'm about to say might come as a little shock, but for those of us that work in these trenches every day, it probably won't: FSC is a marketing scam, pure and simple. It is an attempt to make money off of people's vulnerabilities and an extortion scheme designed to bully printers into paying exhorbitant fees in order to proclaim some sort of make believe enviornmental benefit. If you think that because something has an FSC logo on it, old growth timber has been saved and a baby owl is smiling, think again. When it comes to printing and paper usage, FSC is a racket - no better than organized crime. It is a naked attempt to muscle its way into the middle of the client/customer relation much like the original reverse auction sites did back in the day. In my opinion, FSC does nothing for a printer but destroy value.

I can hear the wails out of certain sales offices now. “You haven’t done enough to sell the value. You haven’t properly sold the benefits of FSC!” But what I ask is, “What benefits, and to whom BESIDES FSC itself?’ Honestly now, is the only benefit the fact that I can try to charge a client a little more to use FSC certified material? Shouldn’t it be, “This will help ensure a better future..” when in fact, FSC is a load of junk when it comes to US forestry products. When I look at anything PSI does, I always try to approach it from a value perspective - like how will this help improve what we do for the customer. How will this show value? So when the whole third party forestry certification thing came up a few years ago, PSI was at the forefront: we were certified to both the FSC and SFI standard years ago. Great, I thought. We can help assuage concerns about virgin paper/recycled paper and give customers some peace of mind.. But what I found is that no customer would pay for the increased cost to have their job produced on certified paper. And then when we finally had someone that might, FSC demanded that we send the artwork to them to have the label placement approved.. Our customers demand security: they trust that I don't let their digital art out in the wild. So for FSC to demand that I send sensitive information to them, prerelease, for THEIR approval doomed the deal.

So, am I the only one that believes FSC is a worthless scam?  No, I'm not.

I know this from my dealings with other printers, from the suppliers, from our vendors involved in the paper and pulp industry, from customers who have seen the dark side of the scam. We all really know this. Leave the marketing dudes outside for a minute. Don’t listen to their “It’s a way to differentiate” or “Ecomagination” hype and bombast. Think about it – US forestry products, and especially the paper industry itself, has always been very proactive and oriented towards its own future survival. The paper and pulp industry knows it needs to manage its forests and the trees of private landowners in a way that will sustain the industry in the long term. The US forestry industry is just like and no different than any other farming industry. Same as corn rotates land and crops, the paper industry does the same. They plant trees, and then harvest these trees 20 years later, and then plant more on a different patch and keep the cycle going.

So the question is how did we get so weak and naïve to think that we needed to let a thuggish organization like FSC dictate to us what is right and proper within our industry? When did we get so sheepish as to allow this marketing machine to run roughshod over the relationship? At one point did we decide to allow a third party to hijack our business processes all in an imagined charade that destroys value and adds nothing but a cost? An FSC certification means nothing more than “Hey, I’m dumb enough to pay this group a lot of money so I can use their logo. Don’t actually think about what it really means. Just blindly believe that the FSC logo means cuddles and grins all around!”

So I'm here to say no more for PSI. I will not spend any more money on a bully organization that does nothing but add a cost to my business, that shows no concern about its own customers much less mine, that attempts to hijack the relationship for its own gain. FSC destroys value; a green gimmick imagined by a bloated bureaucracy that exists only to feed itself. If one wants to choose the better of two evils, SFI is a much better option for PSI and our customers as they at least seem to value their customers, act like we matter - like our processes matter - that we might understand what it takes to make our customers happy. SFI understands the pace of business, the fast moving and nimble decision making that has to be done in order to meet deadlines. FSC is bloated and monolithic. SFI cares about the US forestry business, the small farmer, the small landowner. FSC is trenchant and righteous.  SFI understands the business relationship here in the US far better than FSC. FSC cares not one whit for printers, for printing, for the companies that use printing. FSC only cares about itself and its own righteousness. A hypocritical and disgusting mockery of our own uniquely human desire to do good instead of bad, FSC is a waste of money, time, and effort when it comes to printing and paper.

But make no mistake: I think all third party certification schemes are a waste of time, money, and effort. I saw a new one a few days ago: Ancient Forest Friendly. It had a cute little logo with tree rings..

[sarcasm]Ahhhh. I feel better already![/end sarcasm]

Honestly. When does it stop? PEFC, FSC, SFI, Ancient Forest Friendly, ad nauseum.. All these money making outfits claiming non-profit status, trying to embed themselves on the blood trail of commerce, like dollar-loving parastic leeches dragging themselves from the guilt-swamp of the consumer, praying on our desire to do no harm. But in the end these organizations do nothing but destroy value by adding nothing but a cost to the equation. No trees are saved, no ancient forests kept safe..

So the useless FSC logo will soon be coming down from our site. Good riddance. The sooner we as an industry and as a people start using our head instead of letting the marketing people at FSC twist our heart the better off we all will be..

Supplier Scorecards and Other Esoteric Cosmic Anomalies

I think us printers sometimes get a bad rap. But I think more often than not, we might deserve it.. Take the supplier scorecard for instance. At it's heart, it's a really good idea. Really. It's a tool to communicate results achieved along a certain path. And think of a customer supplied set of workmanship standards as a nice little guidemap of the path. What I think printers tend to do though is, we get defensive. We really try hard, but hickeys are a tough thing to control - so when we see a document that says something about hickeys not allowed on a certain area of a printed piece, we tend to stiffen up a bit; we know that you can't really control a hickey. The darn things just pop up at the most unfortunate times.. We have expensive equipment that attempts to keep hickeys and other debris off the blanket and out of the printed image, but like a black labrador is drawn to a pool of water - a hickey is drawn to print. So we see these documents that talk about limiting the defects and defining what is acceptable and what isn't and the first thing we start talking about is the limitations of imposing limitations. Printers tend to get defensive and say "well, there are going to be defects so...." instead of looking at it as a means to improve communication between us and the customer. I think most customers understand that printing has inherent limitations, and that yes, paper can have dirt on it and sometimes there is dust on a sheet. But I think what they want to hear is that we are attempting to improve what we do and how we do it, and I think the supplier scorecard is actually an important tool along those lines. And at PSI we look at the supplied workmanship standards as quite a nice help as they, if properly done, help alleviate confusion on the floor as to what is acceptable and what isn't. And the scorecard, also if properly done, can help to eliminate surprises and I think most of us really don't want any surprises anymore. On the other hand though; if you get a customer who is unreasonable - a scorecard and a set of workmanship standards can be a real rollercoaster ride. One that usually ends with the car coming off the rails and some injuries.. Not a fun day at the park. But anything that helps us understand the customers needs better, and attempts to improve communication and give direction for our own internal improvement, I'm all for it.
Ken Rizzo
Read yesterday that Ken Rizzo passed away. I had the good fortune of having attended a week long program he ran at the GATF in Pittsburgh back in 1996 on Total Production Maintenance, and we actually had Ken come into our plant back in 2007 for a week to help us implement some lean concepts. I enjoyed working with him, and found him to be a great advocate for the printing industry and a man with great passion for seeking out efficiency in an organization. You may not know him, but the industry will miss him..

Image Courtesy of PIA

Image Courtesy of PIA
Ahem..

Sometimes....

You ever have one of those jobs where it seems no matter what you do, you lose? We just completed one of those.. Funny thing, I saw it from a distance, like storm clouds gathering on the horizon. Where you look at the swirling mass at a distance, see the faint pops of light in the clouds, hear and sometimes even feel the rumbling... You look at it and say, "man, I hope that doesn't come this way..." but sometimes they do. This job, it was one of those. The pricing part wasn't too bad, but there were some hidden tricks we anticipated and had a plan for if this thing became a live order. What made the storm clouds gather and then come closer were the cryptic e-mails we got from people at the company we had never dealt with before, wanting to know about graphic files that were totally wrong, and why we couldn't read them. And then the thing went sideways with the old, "I sent you the e-mail last Friday saying this thing was a go. I need my proofs today and this job has to ship on Tuesday!" So you know, you put on the old rain slicker and go outside and try to unclog the gutter. We got this thing out and not much behind the original schedule, all things considered.  The client worked with us; they just needed what they needed.  We worked with them, and learned the names of some new people and maybe made a new friend.  For some reason, it made me think of Jerry Maguire.

Of course, I'm not Tom Cruise and my office doesn't have nearly as good a view as his.  And I make folding cartons,  I don't deal with world famous sports things..  Besides that, you know, the similarities.... 

I think the reason I think of ol' Jerry though, is that even when all is looking like a complete disaster, you can still pull out a success if you just keep trying.  And success might look totally different than what you envisioned at first, but if we can do something that helps get the order complete and delivered even when all looks lost, I consider that somewhat of a win.

I bet you never thought that much about Jerry Maguire, eh?  I certainly didn't mean to force you too..  I just like the movie.....

Expired Patents Produce Palpitations in Product Attorneys
Read a funny article in the Wall Street Journal about how expired patent numbers printed on consumer items may lead to all sorts of potential problems, thanks to a novel interpretation of an obscure law. Read the article for yourself here. Seems that the application of an expired patent number on a package is against the law, and has been against the law for sometime. They say it can be anticompetitive, and I get that. But the previous penalty for an infraction was something like $500, as it was a penalty for the error. Now it seems that there is a possibility of a company being fined $500 per offense, an offense being each item that is marked incorrectly. So if a tube of toothpaste is marked with an expired number and a company sold 500,000 tubes, they could potentially be on the hook for $250 million. That's a big enough number to get Dr. Evil's attention; and makes me think I got in the wrong business again.. But it's an interesting development and goes to show you never can be too careful when lawyers get involved. [insert gratuitous lawyer joke here]....
More Digital..
When I think of a good fit for digital printing, I think of customization or versioning. When each copy needs to have a change of some sort, whether type or an image, digital would absolutely be the way to go. And for one off short runs, digital is great. A trade show where someone needs 250 custom pint glass cartons to hand out, whatever. And where that printed piece doesn’t need to match up to other pieces that may have been printed at a different time or in another format. But over a multiple sku scenario where there are a few skus that only need a few hundred but others might be thousands, I might run that conventionally for consistency, speed, and efficiency. The point being that just because something is a short run, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a great fit for digital in the packaging arena. What I try to do is listen to what the customer really needs, and then attempt to come up with a program that helps solve whatever issue is present at a cost that helps everybody win. And to solve that problem might require different printing formats, digital, UV, conventional, whatever. But I don’t want the customer to have to worry about designing the program that solves that problem. That is supposed to be my job. And again, getting back to the point that I don’t think customers really care what sort of equipment I or other printers have, as long as it helps solve a problem. That is what I always try to keep in mind first and foremost...
Digital Printing and Folding Cartons
When someone asks me about digital printing options, I’ll usually respond with a question. Annoying, sure, but I’m trying not to be. I really just want to see if the main goal is to lower cost. Because sometimes on the folding carton side, just because we can digitally print something doesn’t necessarily mean that the cost is going to go down drastically, as a lot of the cost of the piece is in the finishing of the carton. Most of the times, the carton has to be die cut and then glued. Maybe some other specialty process is required too, like security tape or source tags. So the printing of the carton itself is not necessarily the most costly part of the process; it might be on an equal level with the other parts. Die cutting takes time. Folding and gluing takes time. This adds cost. And though there are ways to try and mitigate that time by maybe hand gluing the cartons or cutting the sheets on a CAD table, there are trade-offs associated with both, and an unbending cost curve that hits after 10-20 pieces or so. So, let’s play out a little scenario here and see if it makes sense. Let’s say I now work in the marketing department of a mid-sized food company in the northeast. My boss is an underperforming masochist who always says “What’s the exit strategy?” Today, I have been tasked with sourcing 100 three-ball golf ball cartons for a tradeshow in NY. I should’ve stayed in bed….. Anyway, so I start my search and find three vendors who are capable of doing the job. I have to immediately eliminate vendor A though, as they say they don’t want to be bothered with a quantity of 100. So now I’m down to two vendors. One says they will print it digitally and the other says conventionally. Now I figure I’m finally going to make my boss happy because I found a digital guy that will print these boxes and he’s going to save us a lot of money! Quotes come back and the digital guy is a little less, but not by what I thought.. Now my boss isn’t happy.. Why? Again, finishing processes require time and cost. See below:

This scenario plays out whenever ancillary processes are required. In our example above, the total cost is 17% less in theory if I digitally print this thing. That’s a significant amount, granted. But if I removed all of the post-press and just printed the thing digitally, we’d save 43% roughly. That’s why I think digital works great for flat cut items, brochures, catalogs, etc, but not so great with folding cartons. It would be great if a digital press could do the die cutting and gluing, but at this point it’s not there. And this spread lessens the more the quantity increases.. My point is that when someone asks if we can print it digitally, I want to understand why they want us to print it digitally. Sometimes, it seems people think it should be half price if its digital, and that is just not the case in folding cartons. Plus, other issues can come creeping up: rub resistance, cracking, is this small quantity part of a larger run and color is supposed to be consistent across all sku’s, etc. Digital is definitely part of our arsenal and playbook, but usually a careful consideration of what the client is trying to achieve must be taken into account before plunging forward with the process. Is versioning or customization something that is important? Digital is absolutely the way to go. But if price is the only factor, digital will not always solve the issue. Having a vendor that understands how to process small quantity runs is the most important part of the equation.
The Best, Part Two

OK, so my last post ended with how boring it is to stay in the hotels...  But I figured out a way to make that a little more exciting, thanks to Guy Fieri and the Food Network:  Diners, Drive Ins, and Dives.  See, I've always liked unique food and since I might get to go to these neat places to see customers, why not go to a neat place to eat?  So I did.  Here's where I went last night:

Mike's Chili Parlor in Seattle. And yes, it was a dive. But in a good way.. People were very friendly, the Red Sox were playing the Bluejays, what more could I ask for? Umm.. This:

Chili Burger.  They, of course, had other things on the menu.  But as you can guess, they all began with chili.  Like Chili Dog.  Or Chili Bowl, or Chili Steak.  And even Chili Pasta.  But the chili was awesome, IMHO.  Very tasty.  And the green stuff on top?  Chopped jalepenos..  My mouth is still burning.  I had a good time though, and again, enjoyed everyone at the place..  So I think I solved this whole boring hotel thing!  Now I just have to work on my cholesterol level....

The Best

One of the perks of my job; nay, probably the best part of my job is when I get to visit our customers.  I love seeing what people are doing with the products we produce for them, and I love hearing how we are doing.  Good, bad, indifferent.  I really do like to get the feedback from our customers and see what we need to do to improve, how we can do better.  It's great to be an important part of our customers lives, and it's great when we can improve what we do and see that improvement pay out for the customer at the end.  And it's fun to get in front of the customer and see what is important to them and if we are paying attention to that or not.  But probably the most fun is getting into the back to see how the people that have to form our cartons and put stuff into them are doing.  We strive to make sure our cartons work each time, everytime.  We don't want them just to look good;  we want them to perform perfectly. 

Staying at the hotel is kinda boring though, but you take the good with the bad...

Almost Done

The installation is almost complete, the machine is powered up and turning.  Won't be long before sheets are going through and we're off and running on the new press.  Full UV capabilities, interdeck drying, full automation, etc..  I won't bore you with more details, as I think most of us printers tend to believe our customers really care about what sort of equipment we have, where it came from, how much we paid for it.  If you want those details, call me and we'll talk.  Otherwise, I think what most people want to know is the bottom line:  are the assets we own deployed in a manner that brings value to the customer?  And the answer I think is:  it depends.  I know, not really a great answer.  But if you are looking for fast turnaround, high quality packaging at solid pricing, I think we've assembled a great lineup.  This press is an affirmation of our commitment to that equation, and will enable us to deliver product faster, with more options such as pearlescent coating or printing on plastic, with better efficiency driving out costs.  Again, our ultimate goal is to be a world class manufacturer and in order to do that we have to have world class customers.  In order to attract and retain those customers, we have to be able to deliver world class products on time every time.  Might be hokey, be we really want to show we can still manufacture here in the US and compete worldwide.  The assets we employ, machinery and people, will allow us to continue that practice.

The Installation Continues

The concrete guys completed the floor and the foundation is set.  Here's what a reinforced floor looks like before concrete is poured:

Exciting eh?

Well, here's what it looks like once it's completed:

Even more exciting!  But hey, the concrete guys had fun..

So the press arrived on Monday and the riggers came with their really big forklifts and cranes and the parking lot had 7 tractor trailers full of equipment to unload.  But the heavy lifting went without a hitch and the press started to look like a press:

Now comes the really fun part where electricians and mechanical guys crawl all over the press hooking up all the wiring and running all the systems and connecting all the connections..  But it won't be long now.

6/c 28" x 40" press, full UV interdeck dryers, extended delivery plus UV coater.  Full automation, meaning you press a button and the press does the work.  We'll be able to increase our offerings to you, plus do it faster.  That's our main goal here.  Decrease lead times.  Get the product to you faster.  And do it faster without increasing your costs..  Sounds like a great plan to me!

Setting the foundation

Well, we did it.  Just went ahead and did it...  We bought a new press.  We had a really good year last year thanks to all of our customers that honored us with their work.  Don't get me wrong, it was tough.  But considering the enviornment in which we all operated, PSI had a good year.  BUT, I know that we caused some heartache out there for some of our best customers when we might not have been able to move things up in the schedule the way we used to.  Our lead time wasn't what our customers grew to expect from us over the years, and we may not have been able to jump through as many hoops as we once could.  We took steps to correct that by installing the new blanker and folder gluer I mentioned in earlier posts.  But this press is designed to give us the flexibility that we need to service you in the manner you expect and give us the ability to hit those dates, move items up in the schedule, and, hopefully, hit a home run for you everytime.  Look, we're trying to do our part to help the economy, right?  And I truly appreciate all of you enabling us to take this project on and buy these capital goods.  We couldn't, and wouldn't, do it without you.

 

They're digging the foundation as we speak:

Before:

After:

 

Those concrete guys have the best toys..

 

New Blanker

 

We're now up and running on the new blanker we installed from Bobst.  This machine eliminates the need for manual stripping of the waste or broke from the die cut sheets.  This in turn improves efficiency and quality by reducing steps in manufacturing and eliminating a potential quality issue by air hammer damage.  This is all part of our quest to deliver the absolute best experience you've ever had dealing with a folding carton company.  I know, I know.  You never thought it would be this exciting to order a box, eh?  Well, now you know!

What A Year!
Well, we just put another year behind us and I've got to say: It was a really good year for PSI. We grew the business, bought and upgraded equipment, hired new and great people. And it's all due to our fantastic clients and the fact that we've been entrusted to produce this beautiful work for them. We had our challenges this year trying to keep up and I know we asked a lot from our customers AND our own employees to make this work, but as a small business we had to. No government agency or bank was going to come help. So I want to thank everyone who allowed us to have the honor to produce a project for them, and assure you that everyone here at PSI appreciates your business and is looking forward to a great 2010!
New Bobst Gluer
Got our new gluer up and running a month ago or so. Bought a brand new Bobst, 11 gun glue system with full detection/ejection. State of the art stuff.. We bought it specifically for very complex inner cell type carton work; you know, crazy-hard stuff. It's running great and has really enabled us to better meet deadlines. We were struggling there for a while, but we're adding equipment to help with capacity. More to come!

KISS

Saw an article in the WSJ today that explained how some retailers are cutting back on the variety of different products they are selling, simplifying the aisles with less, I guess you could say noise, and focusing on the dominant brands for a particular category.  It mentioned how Wal-Mart sold 24 different tape measures in the past but now is only selling 4 versions.  I laughed a little bit because just this morning I was opening a new tube of toothpaste.  Well, that's not the part that made me laugh.  The laugh came when I was trying to discern what made this particular brand of Crest different than the other brand I used to use, and how many different versions of Crest there are now.  There is the whitening brand. And then the sparkly brand.  And then the whitening brand that sparkles..  It's kinda weird.  I mean, we used to be happy with just the bland bluish paste that came out of the white tube, but now we seem to need all of these crazy versions..  Then I read this article, so maybe we won't get these crazy versions for too much longer.  I personally have always subscribed to the KISS theory.  You know, Keep It Simple Stupid.  But I know some marketing and brand managers that might be a little upset right now.

Me, I like the old stuff.

 

But this is kinda fun for a change I guess!

I don't think this means the deathknell for brand innovation or variety.  It might just mean that you have to look a little harder for your favorite brand of toothpaste though.